.2409090811337.jpg)
The case of Russell Mounger, a pretrial detainee at Creek County Jail, illustrates the consequences of neglecting constitutional safeguards. Central to Mounger’s case is the 14th Amendment’s Due Process Clause, a fundamental legal principle designed to protect individuals from being deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. These protections are far from mere legal formalities; they embody an ethical and legal commitment to humane treatment for those who have yet to be convicted of a crime.
Case Summary
Upon entering the Creek County Jail, Russell Mounger was deprived of essential prescription medications, causing a precipitous decline in his physical and mental health. Despite his increasingly urgent need for medical attention, his pleas were met with repeated indifference by the jail staff, culminating in further abuse and life-long repercussions. Mounger was subjected to physical mistreatment, confined in a restraint chair for prolonged periods, and isolated in solitary confinement—conditions that led to the preventable amputation of both his legs.
Deliberate Indifference & Legal Proceedings
In legal terms, the negligence exhibited in Mounger’s case constitutes "deliberate indifference.” This violation occurs when officials knowingly disregard a substantial risk to a pre-trial detainee’s well-being, thereby violating the protections afforded by the Due Process Clause. Mounger’s civil rights lawsuit, filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, was a decisive move toward accountability. This federal statute provides a mechanism for individuals to seek redress for violations of their constitutional rights by state actors.
Attorneys Clark Brewster and Guy Fortney of Brewster & De Angelis represented Mounger, securing a $2.7 million settlement. The resolution of the case required the dismissal of all defendants except the sheriff, and three jail employees were subsequently terminated due to their involvement in the case.
Conclusion
Russell Mounger’s story contributes to the much broader jurisprudence surrounding pretrial detainee rights and the standards of care in correctional facilities. It reinforces the principle that constitutional rights are not diminished by incarceration and that the state bears a significant responsibility to protect all individuals within the criminal justice system.
For those who have experienced similar violations of civil rights, Brewster & De Angelis remains committed to advocating for justice in such cases. Contact us today for a free consultation.